Like at first glance otherwise nearest and dearest first?
Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties one of lover identification attribute resemblance, relationships onset, matchmaking top quality, and love. [ Backlinks ]
Baxter, L. Good., & Western, L. (2003). Partners perceptions of its similarities and you may differences: A beneficial dialectical perspective. Diary off Personal and you will Social Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you may feelings. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can incompatible relationship (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Actual elegance and you can relationship possibilities: A test of one’s coordinating hypothesis. Diary out of Experimental Social Mindset, 7, 173-189. [ Backlinks ]
Record regarding Societal and personal Relationships, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). The newest therapy off social matchmaking. Upper Saddle Lake, NJ: Pearson Training (Prentice Hallway). [ Links ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Task overall performance and you will attributional telecommunications once the determinants out of social interest. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Interest and you will intimate relationships. Inside D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Brand new guide off social mindset (Vol. dos, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Hill. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, May 11). You.S. Patent 6,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). You.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Website links ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Marital range to own character dispositions: Evaluation that have about three different studies supply. Decisions Genetics, fourteen, 111-123. [ Hyperlinks ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude out of positive and negative reinforcements just like the a good determinant from destination. Journal away from Identification and you may Public Mindset, 2, 884-889. [ Website links ]
Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), For progressive-time Cupids, studies replaces matchmaking: Psychological science try about the latest winning matches made on eHarmony. Organization to possess Mental Research Observer, 18. Downloaded regarding [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. Grams. (2009). Improving partner choices through the internet: A comparison regarding relationship high quality ranging from marriage ceremonies due to an on-line relationships system and you will marriage ceremonies as a result of unfettered selection. Interpersona: A global Journal with the Personal Matchmaking, step 3, 105-125. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Enabling single men and women go into most useful marriages playing with predictive different types of Besök webbplatsen här relationship success. Paper presented from the 16th Yearly Discussion of the Western Emotional Community. [ Backlinks ]
Means and you may system having distinguishing individuals who are probably has actually a successful relationship
C). Why does identification count within the ination off attribute anxiety, negativity, and marital pleasure. Journal off Identification and Social Psychology, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]
Clark, Meters. S. (1985). Effects off relationships sort of getting facts compatibility. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in relationships aspiration and you can satisfaction with desktop-install lovers. Log from ily, twenty-eight, 62-66. [ Website links ]
Cooper, Good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship on the net: Wisdom on the internet appeal. Record away from Sex Degree and Medication, twenty-two, 7-fourteen. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Manage people know very well what they want: A comparable or subservient partner? Evolutionary Mindset, 6, 595-602. [ Links ]
Feingold, A great. (1988). Coordinating to have appeal in the personal lovers and same-sex family relations: An effective meta-research and you will theoretic feedback. Emotional Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Website links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Of popular with appalling: Disenchantment with an enchanting mate. Sociological Viewpoints, 44, 263-280. [ Website links ]
