We are inquiring whether metaphor is a kind of analogous identity or perhaps is to be notable regarding the analogous identity
The the foregoing considerations bring credence into contention one metaphor is a keen analogous label. This can be substantiated of the St Thomas’ techniques concerned thirteen away from brand new Prima Pars , since inside the blog post around three, when he requires if any name is said safely from Jesus, this new resistance lead with the gamble are between incorporate proprie and you will improprie towards second recognized with persuasive essay writing service online metaphor. Up coming, in post six, as he requires in the event that brands popular so you’re able to God and you may animals is actually earliest told you off creatures, this new huge difference proprie/improprie appears to be an effective subdivision regarding analogous term. St Thomas starts of the saying that «during the omnibus nominibus quae de pluribus analogice dicuntur, necesse est quod omnia dicuntur per respectum offer unum: mais aussi ideo illud unum oportet quod ponatur in definitione omnium. Et quia proportion quam significat nomen for each prius dicitur de- eo quod ponitur inside definitione aliorum, ainsi que for every posterius de- aliis, secundum ordinem quo appropinquant advertisement illud primum vel magis vel minus.» This is exactly exemplified from the old legitimate, «suit.» «Sic ergo omni nomina quae metaphorice de- Deo dicuntur for every single prius de creaturis dicuntur quam de- Deo: quia dicta de- Deo, nihil aliud high quam similitudines advertising reports creaturas.» St. Thomas notices the fresh similarity regarding ratio ( similitudo proportionum ) created for the «cheerful meadow» and also in contacting Jesus good lion.
As he continues on to talk regarding other brands «quae non metaphorice dicuntur de- Deo,» the brand new obvious feeling is the fact he could be talking away from almost every other times away from analogous names than metaphors
Are there texts in which St Thomas opposes metaphor and you can example? Whenever we turn-to the latest statements toward Metaphysics , we discover St Thomas pinpointing «potency» into analogous and equivocal settings. «Potency» setting a number of things. «Sed ista multiplicitas quantum ad quosdam analogiae.» This new equivocal methods out of effectiveness are exemplified by the way i talk about step 3 on 3rd stamina as well as the fresh new cube as energy of line. «Et propter hoc for every quamdam similitudinem dicitur potens in the quadratum, sicut dicitur materia potens in the rem» Once more good proportionality see. These equivocal methods are indeed metaphors is obvious regarding parallel passing in book Delta when you look at the placing comments on which St Thomas initiate, «Ostendit quomodo potentia sumatur metaphorice.» Why are these types of methods metaphorical rather than analogical? «His hence modis praetermissis, considerandum est de- potentiis, quae reducuntur ad unam speciem, quia quaelibet earum est principium quoddam, et omnes potentiae sic dictae reducantur offer aliquid principium ex lover quo omnes aliae dicuntur.» In short, St Thomas right here opposes metaphor so you’re able to analogous spends from a name because the second and not the former encompass a reduction so you can what exactly is generally denominated by term under consideration whereas, is they you want citing, on text of the Summa i noticed a moment back, the latest metaphor wasn’t distinguished regarding extension proprie on this basis. Or is they the manner of reference to what is principally signifed from the name and that differentiates metaphor away from analogy, utilize proprie away from improprie ? One thing named metaphorically was, after all, brought to end up being like what the identity securely is short for.
What we should shall be wanting is a few way of justifying the fresh new very preferred difference of metaphor and analogy in a way that zero appeal was designed to Cajetan’s division off example towards the attribution and you will correct proportionality
An enthusiastic aporia has actually clearly emerged, hence, and its particular quality are only able to feel got because of the determining what a good metaphor try and you can exactly what a keen analogous name’s. Methods to these inquiries should allow us to comprehend the apparently conflicting comments off Aquinas.
